Sydney R - Dr. Strangelove

After watching Dr. Strangelove, I was most struck by how much damage the main characters were able to inflict in such a short period of time.  It seems like the events in this movie took place over a few hours or half of a day at the most.  And yet, the men in charge were able to destroy all of humanity because they had the power to do so.  This film emphasized the reality of how much power and trust we give to our leaders, even when they may not deserve it.  An issue here is that the general public does not seem to understand how much power these leaders have.  It is hard to conceptualize the destruction that a nuclear bomb can cause and I doubt that many individuals would want to be tasked with the responsibility of deciding when and where this type of destruction is necessary.  This kind of responsibility requires the leaders that we choose to be perfect which is impossible for humans to achieve.  Finding a near-perfect leader is hard enough, but agreeing on one to elect is even harder.  In the increasingly polarized political climate that we live in, people are becoming less and less willing to compromise.  

I really liked the idea of "final-five voting" that was brought up in the first article because even though we still will not have perfect leaders, this system seems like a way in which we can expand our options and be less confined by party lines (Gehl & Porter, 2020).  With the current system of closed primaries, it forces people to stay in their own political bubble which does not allow for exploring different ideals.  The general election is also restricted in that the public are only given two options, one from each party, to choose from.  I think that this contributes greatly to low voter turnout and the fear of "wasting votes."  If people are not inclined to vote for either candidate, they will either not vote at all or they will vote for the candidate that aligns with their political party, even though they do not necessarily want that person to win.  This new system would loosen the restrictive nature of the primaries and hopefully provide the public with more satisfactory options in the general election.  It would also eliminate the possibility of wasted votes because votes would just be redistributed and all would count towards something no matter what.  

We have become so invested in the systems that we currently have and now we are too afraid to explore new options, even when it may result in a better outcome. The people who are currently in power have too much to lose if a new system were to be proposed, yet the citizens are the ones suffering the consequences.  The use of satire and over exaggeration in the film was successful in emphasizing this reality.  It highlighted the dysfunction within the U.S. government and how the consequences of a broken system can result in disaster.  

Gehl, K. M., & Porter, M. E. (2020, July). Fixing U.S. Politics. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved March 18, 2023, from https://hbr.org/2020/07/fixing-u-s-politics







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Milk - Emma G.

Milk

Reservation Dogs